No Sweat Union Made Apparel - Sweatshop Free Clothing and Sneakers! Shop No Sweat Apparel Our Production Sources No Sweat News Frequently Asked Questions Help out the Movement Anti-Sweatshop Resources About Us No Sweat Contacts
No Sweat Home Page   Customer Account Login  Search Our Product Catalog  Full No Sweat Product List  Affiliate Program  Newsletter Sign-Up  View Your Cart Go to Checkout
   
  Globalize THIS

 















































 


> HELP OUT   > FAQS


How do unions help? Aren't some union shops as abusive as non-union shops? What's wrong with corporate monitors?


To paraphrase Winston Churchill, unions, like all democratic forms of governance, are the worst systems conceivable, except for all the alternatives. Some unions (like some corporations) are dominated by greedy thugs. Some are led by incredibly committed people who have staked their lives (in the developing world, quite literally) to fight for the legitimate rights of working people. One of our company's jobs is to find the unions true to the cause and support them by flooding their shops with orders.

We look at the history of our sources, their track record, their leadership and their rank and file. For example, this issue of the NoSweatZine has an interview with Nazma Akhtar, one of the founders of the Bangladeshi Independent Garment Workers Federation. We hope you'll read it. We also encourage you to take a second look at the critical historic role unions played in the developed world in passing the workplace legislation (child labor laws, minimum wage, job safety, overtime, etc.) that we now take for granted but would sorely miss if it wasn't there. If you study the history closely you will discover that there was a coalition of trade unions AND manufacturers, motivated by enlightened self interest, that made common cause, passed the labor laws, unionized the industry and created the wealth of the West. It is their successful model that we seek to apply to the developing world.

Corporate sponsored workplace monitoring is a top down solution. Independent trade unions are a bottom up solution. We favor both--what the British call a belt and braces approach. A binding union contract turns the workers themselves into a monitoring presence that's hard to fool. And many of the corporate monitoring outfits are divisions of the same accounting firms that have proven themselves unable to protect even the investors' rights.

Independent trade unions have an additional advantage over monitors; the ability to spread to other manufacturers that are less supportive of humane working conditions. Check out this link to an article written by a former workplace monitor that exposes some of the problems inherent in the for-profit monitoring regimes implemented by the Nike/Reebok dominated "Fair Labor Association". Sounds like the monitors could use a union for their own working conditions!


BACK TO FAQ LIST